16K
0.554
2.415
671B
Chat
Inactive

DeepSeek Prover V2

DeepSeek’s Prover V2, a 671B-parameter MoE model, specializes in Lean 4 theorem proving, achieving 88.9% on MiniF2F-test.
DeepSeek Prover V2Techflow Logo - Techflow X Webflow Template

DeepSeek Prover V2

Open-source AI with 128K-token context, excelling in formal theorem proving and mathematical reasoning.

DeepSeek Prover V2 Model Description

DeepSeek Prover V2, developed by DeepSeek, is an open-source large language model tailored for formal theorem proving in Lean 4. Built on DeepSeek-V3, it excels in mathematical reasoning, decomposing complex problems into subgoals for precise proof construction. With a 671-billion-parameter architecture, it’s ideal for advanced mathematical and logical tasks, accessible via Hugging Face and DeepSeek’s API platform.

Technical Specifications

Performance Benchmarks

DeepSeek Prover V2 is a 671-billion-parameter model (37 billion active per token) using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, initialized with a recursive theorem-proving pipeline powered by DeepSeek-V3. It employs Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and DeepSeekMoE for efficient inference, with cold-start data synthesis and reinforcement learning for enhanced reasoning.

  • Context Window: 32K tokens (7B model), extendable to 128K for 671B model.
  • Benchmarks:
    • MiniF2F-test: 88.9% pass ratio, outperforming all open-source models.
    • PutnamBench: Solves 49/658 problems, leading neural theorem proving.
    • ProverBench (325 problems, including AIME 24/25): State-of-the-art results.
    • AIME 2025: Competitive with Qwen3-235B-A22B.
  • Performance: 35 tokens/second output speed, 1.2s latency (TTFT).
  • API Pricing:
    • Input tokens: $0.553875 per million tokens
    • Output tokens: $2.414885 per million tokens

Performance Metrics

DeepSeek Prover V2 metrics

Key Capabilities

DeepSeek Prover V2 specializes in formal theorem proving, integrating informal and formal reasoning via a recursive proof search pipeline. It decomposes complex mathematical problems into manageable subgoals, synthesizing proofs with step-by-step chain-of-thought reasoning.

  • Formal Theorem Proving: Generates and verifies Lean 4 proofs, achieving 88.9% on MiniF2F-test, surpassing all competitors.
  • Mathematical Reasoning: Solves high-school competition-level problems (e.g., AIME 24/25) with precise subgoal decomposition.
  • Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Combines DeepSeek-V3’s reasoning with formal proofs for cohesive outputs.
  • Scalable Inference: MoE architecture with 37B active parameters ensures efficient computation on large-scale tasks.
  • Multilingual Support: Handles mathematical notation and problem statements in multiple languages.
  • Tool Integration: Supports Lean 4 proof assistant for automated verification and proof construction.
  • API Features: Offers structured outputs, reinforcement learning feedback, and OpenAI-compatible API endpoints.

Optimal Use Cases

DeepSeek Prover V2 is designed for scenarios requiring rigorous mathematical and logical reasoning:

  • Mathematical Research: Formalizing proofs for number theory, algebra, and geometry in Lean 4.
  • Educational Tools: Assisting students with competition-level math problems (e.g., AIME, Putnam).
  • Automated Theorem Proving: Developing and verifying formal proofs for academic and industrial applications.
  • Scientific Analysis: Supporting logical reasoning in fields like theoretical physics and computer science.
  • AI-Driven Logic Systems: Building reasoning engines for automated proof assistants.

Comparison with Other Models

DeepSeek Prover V2 excels in formal theorem proving, outperforming general-purpose models in specialized math tasks:

  • vs. Qwen3-235B-A22B: Matches AIME 2025 performance but surpasses in formal proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~80%), though slower (35 vs. 40.1 tokens/second).
  • vs. Gemini 2.5 Flash: Far superior in theorem proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~60%) but lacks multimodality and has higher latency (1.2s vs. 0.8s).
  • vs. DeepSeek-R1: Stronger in formal proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~75%) but less versatile for general reasoning tasks.
  • vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Outperforms in neural theorem proving (PutnamBench: 49/658 vs. ~40/658), with lower costs ($0.00317 vs. ~$0.015 per 1K tokens).

Code Samples

Limitations

  • Limited to text-based mathematical reasoning; no vision or multimodal capabilities.
  • High latency (1.2s TTFT) for real-time applications.
  • Requires Lean 4 expertise for optimal use.
  • Qwen License restricts commercial use; primarily research-focused.

API Integration

DeepSeek Prover V2 integrates via AI/ML API. Documentation available here.

DeepSeek Prover V2 Model Description

DeepSeek Prover V2, developed by DeepSeek, is an open-source large language model tailored for formal theorem proving in Lean 4. Built on DeepSeek-V3, it excels in mathematical reasoning, decomposing complex problems into subgoals for precise proof construction. With a 671-billion-parameter architecture, it’s ideal for advanced mathematical and logical tasks, accessible via Hugging Face and DeepSeek’s API platform.

Technical Specifications

Performance Benchmarks

DeepSeek Prover V2 is a 671-billion-parameter model (37 billion active per token) using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, initialized with a recursive theorem-proving pipeline powered by DeepSeek-V3. It employs Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and DeepSeekMoE for efficient inference, with cold-start data synthesis and reinforcement learning for enhanced reasoning.

  • Context Window: 32K tokens (7B model), extendable to 128K for 671B model.
  • Benchmarks:
    • MiniF2F-test: 88.9% pass ratio, outperforming all open-source models.
    • PutnamBench: Solves 49/658 problems, leading neural theorem proving.
    • ProverBench (325 problems, including AIME 24/25): State-of-the-art results.
    • AIME 2025: Competitive with Qwen3-235B-A22B.
  • Performance: 35 tokens/second output speed, 1.2s latency (TTFT).
  • API Pricing:
    • Input tokens: $0.553875 per million tokens
    • Output tokens: $2.414885 per million tokens

Performance Metrics

DeepSeek Prover V2 metrics

Key Capabilities

DeepSeek Prover V2 specializes in formal theorem proving, integrating informal and formal reasoning via a recursive proof search pipeline. It decomposes complex mathematical problems into manageable subgoals, synthesizing proofs with step-by-step chain-of-thought reasoning.

  • Formal Theorem Proving: Generates and verifies Lean 4 proofs, achieving 88.9% on MiniF2F-test, surpassing all competitors.
  • Mathematical Reasoning: Solves high-school competition-level problems (e.g., AIME 24/25) with precise subgoal decomposition.
  • Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Combines DeepSeek-V3’s reasoning with formal proofs for cohesive outputs.
  • Scalable Inference: MoE architecture with 37B active parameters ensures efficient computation on large-scale tasks.
  • Multilingual Support: Handles mathematical notation and problem statements in multiple languages.
  • Tool Integration: Supports Lean 4 proof assistant for automated verification and proof construction.
  • API Features: Offers structured outputs, reinforcement learning feedback, and OpenAI-compatible API endpoints.

Optimal Use Cases

DeepSeek Prover V2 is designed for scenarios requiring rigorous mathematical and logical reasoning:

  • Mathematical Research: Formalizing proofs for number theory, algebra, and geometry in Lean 4.
  • Educational Tools: Assisting students with competition-level math problems (e.g., AIME, Putnam).
  • Automated Theorem Proving: Developing and verifying formal proofs for academic and industrial applications.
  • Scientific Analysis: Supporting logical reasoning in fields like theoretical physics and computer science.
  • AI-Driven Logic Systems: Building reasoning engines for automated proof assistants.

Comparison with Other Models

DeepSeek Prover V2 excels in formal theorem proving, outperforming general-purpose models in specialized math tasks:

  • vs. Qwen3-235B-A22B: Matches AIME 2025 performance but surpasses in formal proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~80%), though slower (35 vs. 40.1 tokens/second).
  • vs. Gemini 2.5 Flash: Far superior in theorem proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~60%) but lacks multimodality and has higher latency (1.2s vs. 0.8s).
  • vs. DeepSeek-R1: Stronger in formal proving (MiniF2F: 88.9% vs. ~75%) but less versatile for general reasoning tasks.
  • vs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Outperforms in neural theorem proving (PutnamBench: 49/658 vs. ~40/658), with lower costs ($0.00317 vs. ~$0.015 per 1K tokens).

Code Samples

Limitations

  • Limited to text-based mathematical reasoning; no vision or multimodal capabilities.
  • High latency (1.2s TTFT) for real-time applications.
  • Requires Lean 4 expertise for optimal use.
  • Qwen License restricts commercial use; primarily research-focused.

API Integration

DeepSeek Prover V2 integrates via AI/ML API. Documentation available here.

Try it now

400+ AI Models

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Best Growth Choice
for Enterprise

Get API Key
Testimonials

Our Clients' Voices