256K
2.769
11.078
104В
Chat
Active

Command A

Cohere’s Command A, a 111B-parameter model, excels in agentic workflows and multilingual tasks. With a 256K-token context window, it drives enterprise solutions.
Try it now

AI Playground

Test all API models in the sandbox environment before you integrate. We provide more than 200 models to integrate into your app.
AI Playground image
Ai models list in playground
Testimonials

Our Clients' Voices

Command ATechflow Logo - Techflow X Webflow Template

Command A

Command A, with 111B parameters, excels in agentic workflows and multilingual tasks.

Command A Description

Command A is a 111-billion-parameter dense transformer model developed by Cohere, tailored for enterprise AI applications. It excels in agentic workflows, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multilingual tasks, delivering precise, data-grounded insights across 23 languages. Command A is optimized for efficiency and professional use cases such as coding, automation, and conversational intelligence.

Technical Specification

Command A leverages a dense transformer architecture optimized for tool integration and RAG workflows. It supports a broad multilingual spectrum covering 23 languages including Arabic, Chinese (Simplified and Traditional), Russian, and Vietnamese. The model runs efficiently on two A100/H100 GPUs, achieving 150% higher throughput than its predecessor.

Performance Benchmarks

Based on Cohere’s reported metrics:

  • MMLU: 85.5%.
  • MATH: 80.0%.
  • IFEval: 90.0%.
  • BFCL: 63.8%.
  • Taubench: 51.7%.

These metrics highlight strong reasoning (MMLU, IFEval), mathematical problem-solving (MATH), and moderate coding accuracy and business function calling capabilities (Taubench, BFCL). Command A supports a 256K token context window for extended document and workflow handling.

Performance Metrics

Command A demonstrates solid performance in enterprise AI benchmarks, achieving 85.5% on MMLU for reasoning, 63.8% on BFCL for business function calling, and 51.7% on Taubench for coding accuracy, indicating moderate performance in SQL and code translation. It scores 80.0% on MATH and 90.0% on IFEval, reflecting strong reasoning and instruction-following capabilities. Users note effective multilingual support across 23 languages and reliable RAG for data-grounded insights.

Command A Metrics

Key Capabilities

  • Enterprise-grade agentic AI: Integrates external tools for autonomous workflows.
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Provides reliable, data-grounded outputs with citation features.
  • Multilingual support: Enables translation, summarization, and automation across 23 languages.
  • High throughput: Optimized for large-scale usage with increased efficiency over previous versions.
  • Flexible safety modes: Offers contextual and strict safety guardrails for varied deployment needs.
  • API Pricing:
  • Input: $2.769375
  • Output: $11.0775

Optimal Use Cases

  • Coding assistance including SQL query generation and code translation.
  • Data-driven research and financial analysis via RAG.
  • Multilingual task automation for global enterprise workflows.
  • Business process automation with integrated AI tools.
  • Powering sophisticated, context-rich multilingual conversational agents.

Code Samples

Parameters

  • model: string - Specifies the model.
  • prompt: string - Text input describing the task or query for generation.
  • max_tokens: integer - Maximum number of tokens to generate.
  • temperature: float - Controls response randomness, range 0.0 to 5.0.
  • tools: array - List of tools for agentic workflows.
  • language: string - Target language for multilingual tasks, e.g., "en", "fr", "ja".
  • use_rag: boolean - Enables retrieval-augmented generation if true.

Comparison with Other Models

  • Vs. DeepSeek V3: Command A’s 85.5% MMLU is slightly below DeepSeek V3’s ~88.5%, and 51.7% Taubench trails its ~70%. Command A’s 256K context exceeds DeepSeek V3’s 128K, offering an edge in RAG.
  • Vs. GPT-4o: Command A’s 85.5% MMLU is competitive with GPT-4o’s ~87.5%, but 51.7% Taubench lags behind GPT-4o’s ~80%. Command A’s 256K context surpasses GPT-4o’s 128K.
  • Vs. Llama 3.1 8B: Command A’s 85.5% MMLU outperforms Llama 3.1 8B’s ~68.4%, and 51.7% Taubench exceeds its ~61%. Command A’s 256K context far outstrips Llama 3.1 8B’s 8K.

API Integration

Accessible via AI/ML API. Documentation: available here.

Try it now

400+ AI Models

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Best Growth Choice
for Enterprise

Get API Key